Search for: "The Bargain Barn, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2012, 2:48 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Essex issued the public version of Order No. 32 (dated January 31, 2012) granting Microsoft’s Motion for Summary Determination, thereby eliminating an affirmative defense of patent misuse raised by Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:28 pm by Cicely Wilson
Barnes & Noble Inc., US 9th Cir. (8/18/14)Arbitration & Mediation, Consumer Law, Internet LawPlaintiff filed suit on behalf of himself and a putative class of consumers whose Touchpad orders had been cancelled, alleging that Barnes & Noble had engaged in deceptive business practices and false advertising. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:29 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
I couldn’t resist the lure of a bargain. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court … “[n]ot once, but twice,” comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:41 am by Joe Palazzolo
If the current pricing arrangements are voided, publishers fear that Amazon will resume selling some electronic books below cost, putting more pressure on rival Barnes & Noble Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges Darden, Barnes and May. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:29 pm by Juliana
“Amazon law” proposals like the one currently underway in California are supported by small chains and independent retailers as well major corporations, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corp., Best Buy Co. and Barnes & Noble Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Mogul Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a MSK Cargo/King Express (16-CA-24374; 348 NLRB No. 73) Harlingen, TX Nov. 8, 2006. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:49 pm
Goodman (inc.), Cheryl Heuton, Aaron Mendelsohn (inc.), Katherine Fugate (inc.), Timothy J. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
The district court granted the Government summary judgment, and we affirm because Barnes has not provided sufficient evidence of negligence. 07a0159p.06 2007/05/04  Micrel, Inc. v. [read post]